The File Replication Service (FRS) has a justifiably bad reputation for bugginess and indecipherable logs. But recent changes from Redmond make it worth another look.

It's time to ditch File Replication Service and move completely to Distributed File System.

In mid-August, the first commercially available ZFS cloud replication target became available at rsync.net. Who cares, right? As the service itself states, "If you're not sure what this means, our ...

Windows Server 2003 will reach its end next summer, and with it the operating system's File Replication Service.

Do you guys know of other alternative file replication software out there that can do the trick and be able to skip/bypass the corrupt files? My main goal is to have file replicated on all 3 servers.

Adding replication to FlashBlade will help the line better compete with Dell EMC's Isilon, NetApp, Qumulo, and other file-based systems, Asmussen said.

The File Replication Service (FRS) has a justifiably bad reputation for bugginess and indecipherable logs. But recent changes from Redmond make it worth another look.