Liquefied natural gas (LNG), often touted as a cleaner alternative to coal, has a greenhouse gas footprint 33% larger than coal when factoring in its entire production and shipping process, according to a new Cornell study. The findings challenge the perception of LNG as a “bridge fuel” to cleaner energy.

The work challenges the industry line that sending liquefied natural gas around the globe is a cleaner alternative.

Rising LNG exports are expected from the U.S. to China, India, and other emerging economies, as well as global shipping growth and LNG bunkering.

Two additional floating import terminals for liquefied natural gas (LNG) are expected to be operational in Germany before the winter. A spokesman for the government-owned operating company Deutsche Energy Terminal (DET) told dpa in comments published on Sunday that final preparations are being made at the facilities,

Over a 100-year period, LNG's greenhouse gas footprint was found to be the same as or exceeding that of coal. Greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are released into the atmosphere,