The United States can use other measures to recreate the roughly $200 billion in revenues it is collecting under tariffs based on a 1977 law if the Supreme Court strikes down use of that law, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Wednesday.

President Trump's efforts to reshape the executive branch and flex his presidential power are set to be tested at the Supreme Court on Monday.

The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case that could make it harder for convicted murderers to show their lives should be spared because they're intellectually disabled.

A bedrock legal doctrine called "stare decisis," Latin for "to stand by things decided," calls upon courts to respect their prior precedents when resolving new cases on similar matters. A basic tenet of U.S. law is that stare decisis promotes consistency and predictability in the law.

“There is no way that he can prove an IQ below 70,” Overing said.