The Roberts Court should follow its own reasoned decision-making requirements to constrain regulatory demolition.

The Supreme Court should reconsider the doctrine requiring courts to take a hard look at agency policy changes.

Courts must distinguish substantive from procedural duties in agency review to preserve reasoned decision-making.

The duty of an agency to engage in reasoned decision-making is a hardy perennial that courts have applied for over a century.

But others point to the shortcomings of the United States’ largest publicly owned power company—the Tennessee Valley ...

Scholars debate whether the duty to engage in reasoned decision-making should be reconsidered.

Although research spanning decades has linked EtO to life-altering illnesses, the Occupational Safety and Health ...

Although platforms have no obligation to monitor content under Section 230, the U.S. federal law recently signed by President ...

In this week’s Saturday Seminar, scholars consider how the NextGen exam and alternative licensure pathways may transform legal education and who gets to become a lawyer.

In a conversation with The Regulatory Review, administrative and constitutional law scholar Gillian E. Metzger discusses the impact of recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings on administrative law doctrine ...

Scholars argue that the United States government should adapt to address rampant loss of regulatory body quorums.

Permitting reforms in Virginia can inspire greater efficiency and transparency in other jurisdictions.