As the Supreme Court majority has charged to the right, the liberals — and especially Jackson — have begun outlining a ...

The Supreme Court declined to decide whether Texas and Florida laws regulating social media moderation policies ...

The Supreme Court’s decision on social media content moderation could expand protections for tech platforms under the First ...

Among the many rulings the Supreme Court handed down this term, a decision on so-called Chevron deference could prove ...

We already knew about the court’s three-justice liberal faction, consisting of justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. What’s new is a clear split among the court’s ...

Remember, not so long ago, when Republicans pretended to dislike “judicial activism”? Well, a couple of weeks ago, the ...

Last week’s Supreme Court decision in the NetChoice cases was overshadowed by a ruling on presidential immunity in Trump v.

Court signals that Texas and Florida laws preventing content moderation run afoul of the First Amendment, writes Syracuse ...

All Gaul is divided into three parts,” Julius Caesar famously wrote. The same is now clearly true of the Supreme Court. And ...

The Supreme Court sidestepped major questions involving the internet in its last term, even as it weighed issues with the ...

The Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity raises concerns for democracy. Dr. E. Faye Williams on the dissenting voices and implications for justice.

Should progressives be more alarmed by Donald Trump’s threat to the Constitution or by the Constitution’s threat to progressivism? For the answer, read on.