The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money trial is pushing back a date for a key ruling on presidential immunity until two days before Trump’s scheduled sentencing.

What effect does the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling have on Donald Trump’s New York criminal case? According to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office, it has “no bearing on this prosecution.

The judge in Trump's hush money trial delays a date for ruling on presidential immunity. The decision was originally expected Sept. 6 with sentencing set for Sept. 18.

NEW YORK — Prosecutors are urging a judge to uphold Donald Trump’s historic hush money conviction, arguing in court papers released Thursday that the verdict should stand despite the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity.

Trump's legal team moved in July for the judge to dismiss the guilty verdict against him in the so-called hush money case after the Supreme Court ruled the president has immunity for official acts. Trump's lawyers argue that the trial was tainted by evidence and testimony that is protected under presidential immunity.

Judge Juan M. Merchan postpones the ruling on presidential immunity in Donald Trump's hush money trial until September 16. The delay comes after Trump's legal team requested the judge's recusal from the case.

The Supreme Court of the United States has refused to halt the announcement of the sentence for former President Donald Trump, who a state court in New York convicted. The case involves the payment of "hush money" to Stormy Daniels.

The US Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request from the state of Missouri to delay the sentencing of Donald Trump in New York. The case involves criminal charges related to hush money payments to a porn star,

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey's efforts to delay sentencing in former President Donald Trump's hush money case in New York were rejected Monday by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision comes a day before Bailey will face off in the Aug.